Professional Judgment
Professional judgment is reasoned decision-making based on training, observation, student need, context, and the practitioner’s role. It is not a mood. It is not a personality trait. It should be explainable.
-
-
Professional Judgment Is Not a Mood
Professional judgment is not a vibe, a preference, or a dramatic feeling in a cardigan. It is reasoned, documented, child-centered analysis. It connects what the practitioner observes, what the plan requires, what the student needs, and what the team should consider next. That is very different from being difficult. It is also very different from…
-
Protective Advocacy
Protective advocacy means speaking up in a way that protects the student, the family, and the institution from preventable gaps, drift, or risk. It is not advocacy as a performance. It is advocacy as early warning, clear reasoning, and documented follow-through.
-
Why Does It Matter If a Practitioner Speaks Up?
It matters because a practitioner may be the person who can see the gap between the written plan and the actual school day. Speaking up is not automatically conflict. Sometimes it is how the team finds a problem early enough to fix it.
-
How Clinical Advocacy Reduces Institutional Risk
Clinical advocacy is often misunderstood as opposition. It is better understood as early risk detection. When a practitioner clearly documents what the plan requires, what is happening in practice, where the gap sits, and what might happen if the gap continues, they are protecting more than the child. They are protecting the family’s trust and…
-
When Speaking Up Is Treated Like Creating a Problem
Sometimes the person naming the gap gets treated like the gap. A practitioner points out that the plan is not being implemented, the staffing does not match the support described, or the documentation is too thin. Instead of treating that as useful risk information, the system treats the practitioner as the source of discomfort. That…
-
Advocacy Protects the Child, the Family, and the Institution
Good advocacy is not just pressure on the school. Done well, it protects the child, the family, and the institution. When a practitioner says, “Here is what the plan says, here is what is actually happening, and here is the gap,” that is not creating a problem. That is finding the problem while there is…
-
Safety Should Clarify the Plan, Not End the Conversation
Safety matters. Of course it does. But “safety” should not become a magic word that ends the conversation before anyone explains the actual risk, the benefit, the alternatives, and the plan. Real safety work makes the plan clearer. It does not hide the reasoning.
-
How to Use Vendor Expertise Without Handing Over the Decision
Good vendors can be extremely useful. They know equipment details the rest of us do not want to pretend we know. The key is role clarity. Let the vendor inform options, measurements, product constraints, ordering, and repairs. Keep the student need, educational relevance, clinical reasoning, and implementation plan with the team.
-
Vendors Inform the Decision, They Do Not Own It
Equipment vendors can be very helpful. They know products, parts, ordering, repairs, and options the team may not know. But vendor expertise is not the same as clinical judgment, educational relevance, or IEP team decision-making. The vendor can inform the decision. The team still has to own the reasoning.